悼念气候专家PROFOCA会员审计佛雷德.哥德贝尔

北欧绿色邮报网  陈雪霏

11月9日,斯德哥尔摩大雪纷飞。美国大选传来消息,特朗普获胜。大雪不停地下着,让我想到了10年前同样的雪,也想到了我们瑞典专业外国记者协会的老会员佛雷德.哥德贝尔(Fred Goldberg).

10153040_136256199878373_4400592857039693095_n

右一。

上星期一10月31日,我和同事瑞克去医院看望他。当时,他看起来很瘦,只吃了一勺中午饭。我说我从伦敦回来再给他打电话。所以,尽管我没有去成伦敦,我还是在PROFOCA和中欧文化协会举行完文艺汇演之后,想着给他打个电话。结果电话那头传来的是他女儿安妮卡的声音。她说佛雷德在11月6日星期天就去世了。那天斯德哥尔摩就开始下雪了。

人要走,可能都有预感。10月26日中午,我接到佛雷德打来的电话,从声音上,听不出异常,但是,他一开口就对我说,我要走了,恐怕不能再给PROFOCA做审计了。我的大脑嗡地一下,不知从何说起。他却平静地说,五年前,他就得了前列腺癌。现在已经扩散到全身各个器官。我说,你要坚持,我过两天就去看你。

1491741_136256283211698_2717464661842322185_n第二天,我们在新闻司办公室举办了关于美国总统大选的选前分析。当时,我就和秘书长瑞克说,我们第二天看完演出场地就去看佛雷德。

第二天,我做好佛雷德喜欢的牛肉饭,给他发了个短信说,下午去看他。结果,他回信说,当天不可能。周六或周日可以。可是,周六和周日我们都不行,所以就说周一中午。

周一中午,我和瑞克一起去看他。他已经坐在轮椅上,不能走路。他说他很高兴我们能来看他。我说,非常感谢你对PROFOCA的支持。PROFOCA能一路走来,你的贡献是不可或缺的。告别时,我说我从伦敦回来就会再去看他。没想到,周日,他就走了。

佛雷德是一个热心的人。他担任PROFOCA审计多年,工作一丝不苟,每次都教我哪里是对的,哪里不合适,怎么改,都非常认真。尽管我们的预算只有几千块钱,但是,我学会了工作方法。

佛雷德是一个认真的人。他毕业于瑞典皇家科技大学,本来是学冶炼专业的。但是,他酷爱滑雪和野营。通过对北极冰川的研究,他开始对气候问题感兴趣并认真钻研。他到过美国休斯顿航天局调研。阅读大量史前气候资料。通过和许多国际上的气候专家交流研讨,他认为气候变化是自然的,不是人为的。从2006年11月份的第一场雪之后,气候变暖的趋势,几乎是让人人都能感觉得到。

但是,佛雷德认为,这是因为太平洋海底的热浪从海底流到两极造成的。气候变冷变暖都是自然现象,不是人为的因素造成的。不应该吓唬人们。他认为,人类其实需要二氧化碳,这样,可以进行更多的生产,好为人类提供更多的农产品。但最让我印象深刻的是,他说,过几年,我们还将遇到比较寒冷的冬天。人们应该做好准备。

佛雷德是一个斗士。他坚持自己的观点,即使在哥本哈根气候大会上,他也直抒他的观点,他到美国去讲学,到日本去讲学,到挪威去讲学,在过去五年里,就是说当他得知得了癌症之后,他依然到世界各地旅行,宣传他的观点。他坚持不懈。

我不知道今天的大雪真的是象他说的那样,太阳黑子多了,挡住了阳光,所以,气候变冷了,还是真的因为世界经济不景气,关闭了工厂,导致气候变冷了?因为历史上,1929年-1931年的经济危机时,世界气温是下降了很多。

有人说,气候变暖是长期的,要到2100年北极的冰就要全部化成海水。到那时,北极可以自由航行成为不冻海域了。商人们和政客们立即想到要如何分配那里的资源。

但是,佛雷德说,他认为北极的冰不但没少,反而增厚了。他的观点是地球的冷热不是人类活动能左右的,主要问题取决于太阳的活动。当然,如果发生火山喷发,挡住云层,也会对地球的气温产生影响。但是,他并不否认人类工业生产造成了严重的环境污染。大气污染。这种污染可以通过改善汽车的三滤,减少污染气体的排放。也可以通过洗煤,使用清洁能源。保护环境不受污染,是人类的职责,是政治家的职责。应该这样做,但他警告政治家不要受IPCC之类的文件影响,因为,他们的监测位置是不科学的。

佛雷德说,人类行为也可以造成热岛效应,例如北京市内的温度可能会比郊区的温度高出两三度。这是人类行为,高楼大厦,机动车等造成的。但从长远看,气候变化是自然的。

我本人其实是觉得我们人类的行为确实改变了我们的生存环境,因此,人类有责任改善我们的环境,保护我们的环境。因为我们没有车的时候,天确实就是蓝,有了很多车以后,就出现了雾霾。但是,我也不想吓唬人。只是觉得为什么我们得癌症的人越来越多,呼吸道病越来越多,这肯定与我们的环境有关。我们必须引起重视。

我认为佛雷德的观点值得尊重,他这个人值得尊重。他女儿对我说,他为我们带来了大雪,真好!窗外大雪一直不停地下着。

他的去世是我们PROFOCA的巨大损失。我相信也是气候界同仁的一个巨大损失。我们将永远怀念他!

佛雷德的葬礼将在12月2日在立丁岛举行。

陈雪霏是瑞典专业外国记者协会PROFOCA的会长,理事会主席。

 

 

以下附笔者2010年采访Fred Goldberg的文章:

Swedish expert says CO2 is not the main cause of global warming

13:28, April 22, 2010      

Email | Print | Subscribe | Comments | Forum 

Swedish climate expert Dr. Fred Goldberg has said that carbon dioxide is not the main cause of the global warming. The climate change is not affected by human action, but mainly by the solar activities and ocean currents such as PDO (Pacific Decadal oscillations). He even predicts that the earth is going to experience colder winters in the following years or even decades.

Goldberg stressed that man should separate the concept of climate change from environmental issues. He holds that climate change is natural and caused by the sun activity, but the urban heat island effect and environmental problems are mainly caused by human activities and behavior. In an exclusive interview with People’s Daily Online, Goldberg explained his ideas.

History of climate on earth

“We could have an ice age any time,” Dr. Goldberg says, “Over the past one million years, we have experienced eight ice ages. Eighty percent of the last million years was ice age. We are lucky to live in this short inter-glacial period.”

“If we go down to the last 4000 to 3500 years in the Bronze Age period, it was three degrees warmer than today on the northern hemisphere at least,” Goldberg explained.

“Two thousand years ago, during the Roman period or during China’s East Han Dynasty, the temperature was two degrees higher than now,” he said.
During the Viking era a thousand years ago it was one degree Celsius warmer.

Goldberg said there is a nearly 1000 year cycle in climate change but there is a downward trend indicating that we are going towards a new ice age within 4000 years.

During the Viking era or the medieval Warm Period it was warm enough to grow grapes and cereal in England, he said.

“We had a new peak in high temperature in 2002 after a solar activity maximum, now the temperature is going down again. So we are heading into a cooling period.”

“If you look at the last 150 years, we had a warming period from 1910 to 1940 and then a cooling period from 1941 to 1977. Then it was a warming period from 1977 to 2002,” Goldberg said. This shows a 60 year cycle correlating to the ocean current PDO in the Pacific Ocean.

During the depression period 1929-1933, the production of CO2 went down by 30 percent. But due to the increase of the global temperature, the CO2 increased in the atmosphere because of the heating of the oceans thereby emitting CO2.

In 1991, there was an eruption of the Pinatubo volcano, one saw the reduction of CO2 because the volcano ash blocked the sun causing a cooling of the oceans. Goldberg said this is an indication that it was the solar activity that decides the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Can we trust the measurement of the global temperature?

Dr. Goldberg said that there is an urban effect around heavily populated cities in our world, for example, the gap in temperature between the suburban Stockholm and the city center can often be at least 2 degrees Celsius. And the gap between Beijing city center and Great Wall area can be six degrees Celsius. The urban effect is caused by human’s construction, transportation and the density of the housing and population, but this is not a global effect.

“You cannot compensate for urban effects because you don’t know how much it is, it changes with cloudiness, time of day, sun position over the horizon, wind intensity and direction and winter or summer,” Goldberg said.

He questioned the accuracy of the measurement in Al Gore’s The Inconvenient Truth. He said that in the USA about 900 stations accounting to 78 percent of the total are incorrectly located such as in the parking place or airports near the airplanes or runways where he believes it is definitely hotter than other natural areas such as mountains or rivers.
About 90 percent of the places where they measured the temperature are not according to regulations and have an error of 1 to 5 degrees C, which he thinks is very big. The only accurate way to measure temperature is with satellite, Goldberg said.

Another thing that matters is that climate scientist must do what they say they do,” Goldberg argued.

Phil Jones in Hadley Centre said he wouldn’t give out the data about his 25 years of work to someone who only wants to find something wrong with it thereby violating the Freedom of Information Act, Goldberg held.

How much carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere?

How much CO2 is there in the air? Only 0.0387 %, it has neither odor, nor color and is not poisonous. If there isn’t CO2, there will not be plant life, therefore, we must have CO2, we need it, Goldberg argued.

He said that the average amount of water vapor is 30.000 ppm. So the consequence of that is that 95 percent or even up to 98 percent of the total greenhouse effect is water vapor while only one percent is CO2. The other greenhouse gases are ozone, methane and CFC, etc.

Goldberg said even if human beings emit 100 ppm CO2, 98 percent of it will go into the ocean because of the chemical balance between the oceans and the atmosphere. The remaining 2 ppm will be added to the atmosphere which is negligible because there isn’t enough oil and gas in the world to generate enough carbon dioxide to change the climate.

Over the past 100 years, with an increase of 100 ppm CO2, the earth temperature only increased 0.7 degree. Thus it is not possible for the temperature to increase 2 degrees globally which our politicians want to prevent, Goldberg said.

Why? Goldberg explained that the ocean will absorb large amount of CO2. Once it is absorbed by the ocean, it will to some extent become calcium carbonate which is the same thing as limestone. Then the limestone will be building up at the bottom of the oceans. The whole island of Gotland which is the largest island in Sweden is formed of limestone.

“It was built up at the bottom of the ocean because the ocean absorbed the CO2 and when saturated it formed limestone sediments at the bottom of the ocean. The CO2 content in the atmosphere has been shrinking continuously. A billion years ago, there was 80 percent CO2 in the atmosphere, now it is 0.038 %. It ‘s been shrinking all the time, it is continuing because of the formations of limestone sediments in the oceans.” Goldberg explained.
He said that the transport of CO2 is controlled by ocean temperature. For example, one can send CO2 bubbles into a bottle of cold water which is about 5 degrees C, but if one opens the bottle and puts it on the table, the water temperature will increase, and the CO2 will leave the water soon.

The same theory, the lakes absorb a lot of CO2 in winter and it releases the CO2 in summer when the temperature reaches 23 to 25 degrees, you won’t have much CO2 in the water. Thus this is a natural process and with all the minerals in sea water, the sea water can absorbs 73 times more CO2 than fresh water.

“Mount Mauna Loa in Hawaii is the world’s largest live volcano which emits a lot of CO2. 87 percent of the data recorded there has to be edited. The data may therefore have been manipulated,” Goldberg said.
He said that in 1973 there was a big eruption and there were no measurements done for 3 months, but there is no data gap in the diagrams. Why? Asked Goldberg.

“Many climate scientists are bluffing in order to please the politicians who want to put a tax on CO2. These scientists live in symbiosis with the politicians. They both depend on each other,” Goldberg criticized this.

Solar activity decides whether the temperature is up or down

Goldberg said that solar activity has increased 3 times according to records from NASA earth observatory. This is something we can’t do anything about.

“The activity of the sun shows the highest activity ever recorded in 2002. Earlier history of solar activity can be seen from the distribution of isotopes in rocks and biomass which are depending on the solar activity,” Goldberg explained.

Sun activity heats the sea surface, and the sea releases CO2. Over the past 100 years, 100 ppm CO2 were emitted due to the warming of the sea surface.

In the atmosphere, there is 750 gigaton of carbon. In the ocean there is 38.100 gigatons of Carbondioxide. That is 50 times more according to the famous Henry’s Law. Henry’s law says that 98 percent of CO2 stays in the ocean while about 2 percent stays in the atmosphere.

It is estimated that humans today generate about 8 gigaton CO2. Thus we release approx. one percent of CO2 to the atmosphere. The biomass is absorbing 121 gigaton and the oceans 92 gigaton. That means 28 percent of the CO2 in the atmosphere is absorbed each year in a cycle. All the CO2 in the air will be absorbed in less than 5 years, which means if we emit one percent a year, that percent is also included in the absorption. So one can never find more than 4 percent of CO2 in the atmosphere coming from humans,” Goldberg explained.

Along the equator, the sun is heating the water. When the water is warmer, the water is releasing carbon dioxide (CO2). The colder the water is, the more CO2 it absorbs. And therefore the colder waters around the Arctic and Antarctica will absorb a lot of CO2. There is a huge cycle of CO2. If you take out the CO2 for plants, then the ocean will evaporate more to air. If you emit more, the ocean will take it up. Ocean controls the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. The sun controls the ocean temperatures which in turn has a strong effect on the climate on earth.

“The people of Bangladesh breaths out 75 million tons CO2 per year, Sweden generates 60 million tons per year from all its industrial activities, transports and warming of houses etc. while the people in China breathes out 700-800 million tons per year. What does it mean? It means to reduce the amount of the CO2 will have no effect on our climate at all. You cannot do anything, I mean you cannot stop the sun from coming up tomorrow morning. If we cannot stop the sun from going up in the morning, can we change the CO2 system in the atmosphere? It is self regulated and sun-controlled,” Goldberg said.

Why comes El Nino?

So far no one can give a good explanation on why we have El Nino or other stormy weather. But Goldberg has his explanation.
“The sun is heating the ocean surface and water is evaporating off. When the water evaporates from the ocean, the salinity in the surface water increases. Then the water gets heavier. So the warm water get heavier and sinks, and then the less heavy water flows up to the surface. It exposes to the sun, and the same process continues. There is a salty warm water going down, and it drifts off with the current under the surface for some time. Then suddenly the current hits another current and pushes the water up, then comes up to the surface and releases the heat it collected. It happened on the east and west side of the Pacific Ocean depending on the pattern of the current,” Goldberg said.

Why does the arctic ice melt?

Goldberg explained that the reason we have the Gulf Stream is that the rotation of the earth creates a force to push the water north. To stop the Gulf stream, one has to stop the rotation of the earth.

It is the same theory with the ancient trade current or trade wind, when you travel from Europe to China, you have to wait for the winds to go in that direction and when you arrived in China, you have to wait another six months until the wind change direction so that you could sail back again.
Goldberg said in 1977, there was a great climate shift in the Pacific Ocean, the temperature in Alaska increased by 3 degree C in one year. In 2008, it decreased 3 degrees back to normal which means the warm water is not going to the Arctic Ocean any more.

“So when you hear the ice in Arctic Ocean is disappearing, it was because of this warm current flowing to the Arctic. Now it has stopped. So the ice is building up again. Very few seems to have understood this. They think it is the global warming that has melted the ice, but in fact, it is the warm current that melted the ice,” Goldberg said.

Then also strong currents carried the ice out into the Atlantic where it melts.
Goldberg said whether the current is warm or cold depends on if the PDO is positive or negative. If it is positive, there is warm current entering the Arctic Ocean and if it is negative, the warm water stays in the western Pacific Ocean.

Goldberg already predicted in the summer of 2009 that the 2010 winter will be a very cold one because the solar activity was zero according to data in NASA in the US and Kiruna in Northern Sweden.

“If we look at the history, we see almost three years without sun spot. Thus, I think it will be cold. Last time with a similar situation was between 1810 and 1812. That also coincided with the time when Napoleon invaded Moscow,” said Goldberg.

“I think China should prepare for future cold weather because as a consequence the food production will go down.” Goldberg concluded.
Goldberg focuses on climate issues for over a dozen years with well grounded science knowledge. He used to teach in Sweden’s Royal Technology University.

By Xuefei Chen, People’s Daily Online correspondent in Stockholm, chenxuefei7@hotmail.com

(Editor:张洪宇)

Leave a Reply